A conference on Aboriginal Mental Health and Wellness
If you try to paint a psychological portrait of power, seen through the eyes of our respondents, we can put this scheme in the field of action of the two psychological variables: strength – weakness and sympathy – antipathy. Especially we have undertaken semantic analysis shows that the image of real political power at all levels, institutions and personalities outlined definitions of power as primarily a weak and an unpopular, the vast majority of respondents. However, to our question about the ideal power, one respondent said reasonably, that the ideal of power can not imagine, as the authorities in Russia are always unhappy.
What is it that the claim expressed by the current government? First of all, it criticized for being weak, or simply for the lack of power manifestations. Our respondents want to feel the presence of a strong government in everyday life. While we will not touch the psychological reasons for this need – just state the phenomenon of alienation from government, ordinary citizens as well, however, and those lawmakers who were interviewed by us. Our respondents politicians, speaking of power, to be met by her claim as outsiders (“keep the law,” “the power of acting unprofessionally”, “power is unpredictable, not respected the rules of the game” and so on). The difference between politicians and ordinary citizens, perhaps, only in a greater impact of field evaluations in the past. Perhaps the representatives of the executive or judicial structures differently perceived power, but in 15 surveyed legislators (except for the most famous of made noise) power is the same negative emotions and perceived as weak. In this they are absolutely united with their constituents.
The second characteristic of the psychological power is its vagueness. Simply put, our citizens do not feel the power not only because it is weak, unsteady, but she – is uncertain. They do not know what to expect from it. Many respondents point to its inconsistency, indecisiveness, the instability of the political line. Discomfort from the absence or lack of understanding of the rules by which interacts with the public authorities, perhaps, annoying people is no less than what the power of “willfulness.” By the way, the reproach of non-compliance with laws or inconsistency in the authorities should not be considered from the point of view of the fact that our citizens do not crave 232
implement these laws. But psychologically it is necessary to have some framework agreements with the government. In general, we obtain a sort of portrait of a hysterical, the sluggish and rather eccentric “person”. It can not, or can not work, but a lot of talking. Citizens do not understand, in whose interests it operates, expressing suspicion that the national interests of the state government does not care too much, it does not take into account the interests of citizens, but their own interests and rights.
Expectations of respondents regarding the real power fall into three categories: the actual political, business, and psychological. Contrary to popular belief about politics as a “dirty” area, moral-psychological assessment of power on the part of our respondents are in first place in respect of the current government (40.7%), and with respect to the “ideal” of power (39.8% ). These estimates are more likely to be negative than positive. The current government is unfair to our citizens, hypocritical, deceitful (unfair), corrupt, indifferent to his people. One respondent gave a succinct assessment of moral authority: “They steal. Do not think. Do not respect the laws. ” Another said of the media power: “These people are usually stupid, uneducated and do not know how to keep yourself worthy.”
Meanwhile, claims to politics and business qualities of the current government has expressed about the same number of respondents (17.1% and 21.8% of the respondents, each of whom gave more than one answer.) Among the la jolla homes for sale political expectations of distinct formulations are rare, except for references to democracy, patriotism, dictatorship or communism. One respondent gave a clear diagnosis of power: “The tsarist plus anarchy in management.” The other spoke of the roller blinds desirability of accelerating reforms that earlier standard of living was higher and the like, but all – is very uncertain.
If we consider the simcity buildit hack tool specific psychological characteristics of real power, we must first pay attention to the fact that in the eyes of our respondents of its members – self-centered, “quarrelsome”, only care about their own affordable seo packages well-being. These estimates should be seen simultaneously and moral condemnation of misconduct of the authorities, and the desire to be closer to that of power, be it noticed, to overcome alienation. The power in this The Expanse series download case resembles the ne’er-do mother, not taking care of their children, who do not stop dreaming about her attention and love.
Psychological profile of the ideal of http://www.contactnumber.net power looks like a negative image of the real power and includes the following features. The authorities want to see a solid, strong and even harsh. It has to be viable, committed to its citizens, independent and beauty nutrition cohesive. Several times repeated the requirement that the government was more youthful and rejuvenated, not implicated in previous political “games”. Repeatedly describing the image of the ideal of power, the http://www.ps-carouge.ch/web/detruire-le-service-public/ respondents expressed the desire to see the power of smart, competent, professional, able to clearly articulate the goals of development and is of strategic thinking.
These data point to very contradictory requirements for power on the part of respondents. On the one hand, they reproached her for looseness, uncertainty, inconsistency and unreliability, greed and selfishness, on the other – unconsciously drawn to top 10 Blu-Ray Players this weak, stupid, hypocritical and corrupt “special”. The responses were great guesses, one of the respondents suspected that the authorities in Russia to always regarded negatively, another noted that a caring and loving power can not “by definition”. But most stubbornly continues to stand his ground: the government should take care of gemme illimit the people should be more responsible, mature, experienced, predictable.
What are the real psychological reasons behind these demands to the authorities? Let us first consider the needs of those who are in favor of the above estimates of our respondents and determine their discontent with the current government. We use here the classification of the psychological needs of the well-known American scientist Abraham Maslow. All he needs proposed to divide into five levels, hierarchically arranged: material existence, security, love, self-realization and at the very top – the need for self-actualization. Quantitative analysis of statements of our respondents in the open questions in the questionnaire revealed the following ratios.
Each of the five levels of needs in their own way affects the formation of a comprehensive image of power (real and ideal). In the psychological literature, there is evidence that when the demand is not satisfied, it has a motivating effect on human behavior. Picture of the world has also shaped by the unmet need. This applies also to the images we are interested in power.